Euthanasias 'R Us

Remember when the so called debate was at a fever pitch over Obamacare? That is to say, before many backroom deals and having it crammed down our throats, one of the biggest concerns was the "death panels" that would ensue after its full passage.

I know, Liberals don't like the use of the term, "death panels," and prefer the Obamacare terminology of, "End of Life Counseling." In fact those that use the term, "death panels" are completely mocked and humiliated by the lame street media as being moronic, crazy, lunatic extremists for thinking that America would ever euthanize anyone besides babies in the womb, who they don't consider to be living people. They would be the first to march against euthanizing animals.

But, in the case of then Illinois Senator Barack Obama, he voted to allow infanticide when Illinois SB 1082 was voted down in the committee of which he was the chair. That bill would have allowed for the protection of any child including abortion survivors.  The bill defined the term "born-alive infant" as any infant, even one born as the result of an unsuccessful abortion that shows vital signs separate from its mother. The bill would have established that infants thus defined were humans with legal rights.

We have tried and tried to tell you. If you give an inch, they take a mile. This is why believers in right to life are so adamant about defending life. When life is cheapened in any way it affects life at every stage of the game including the euthanasia of the "non-useful-to-society" such as the handicapped, mentally retarded, and the elderly who are deemed as unfit to live because they have outlived their usefulness to society. 

You think I'm making this up? Check out news from the champion of the world in euthanasia, the Netherlands. This article from The Guardian on March 1, 2012, "Dutch mobile euthanasia units to make house calls," explains how the Dutch will now make house calls to euthanize those who want to end their lives. Holy Soylent Green, Batman. Is this really happening? Yes it is. This is not a trick title or heading. The article explains in detail how the Dutch Association for a Voluntary End to Life has launched what they call house-call units. And the services are being offered FREE OF CHARGE! Does that not set off an alarm bell for anyone other than me? No charge, just give us a call and we'll come put you down before you know what hit you. Oh, don't worry about not having the money, just give us a call at, Euthanasias 'R Us!

So you say, "but that could never happen here." It's just plain old, simple math, people. Let me try to explain it so even a liberal can understand. When you give every citizen "free" healthcare in a situation where medical facilities and practitioners are already in short supply ---> decrease the amount of money the government will pay them, thereby reducing the amount of people willing to spend 10 years of their life preparing to be doctors ----> (Now stay with me, it's simple math)----> it naturally follows that there won't be enough healthcare to go around ------> so somebody has to decide who receives treatment and who doesn’t ----->not the doctors or patients, that duty would fall on, you guessed it,  the "End of Life Counseling" panel. It's common sense people. Who gets the cancer treatment.....my 93 year old dad who has worked hard all his life to pay for his health insurance or the 25 year old who’s never worked a day in his life?

Now doesn't that sound a whole lot better than the "Death Panel?" I mean death panel is such a messy term; we better not use that one. In case you think my mathematical formula for who gets eliminated in this game of Big-Government-playing-God, is a bunch of hypothetical nonsense, it's already in full use. The Dutch have been using this model for years, along with universal healthcare. The Dutch are now killing 2300 to 3100 people a year through the End of Life Association. The actual numbers are likely to be much higher since many cases are not registered.

Remember the story from my blog, "Right to Choose" about throwing a frog in water? That's the principle at work here. Throw a frog in boiling water, he will jump out. But, throw him in a pot of cold water and slowly turn up the heat and he will never notice and slowly boil to death. Here's the analogy. Justify that fetuses are not humans yet -allow them to be killed in the womb - then allow those that are in the last trimester to be killed in partial birth abortion - then allow an abortion survival baby to just lay on the table to die instead of receiving life-saving medical attention - then say that it's merciful to let anyone choose to end their life, and you see how the heart and mindset gets totally de-sensitized to the protection of all life.

The Declaration of Independence declares that all men are "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Well, it all starts with right to life. There can be no liberty or pursuit of happiness without having life. America, we must pursue the sanctity of life and we must be vigilant in exposing all lies and distortions of truth that claim otherwise. 
God Bless America!
Storeytime